wrote ... I think he put the heroin there so he could test Charlie by telling him to go get something out og hte bunker, to see if he takes one of the statues or not.
Yeah, now that you mention that, it would make sense.
Joined: Wed Mar 16 2005, 01:18am
Location: in a Finnish goat hut north of the Arctic circle
Posts: 1534
Wait. Ooops I meant Locke as the evil force. Hurley is a teddy bear, sorry about that!!! Hurley is great, albeit conflicted. I hope I get laid before he does though hehe
No, I think Locke is beginning to get a bit psycho and needs to be watched. This was a guy who was possessed by sitting in front of his natural father's house night after night in need of some kind of attention for validation etc. The way he is getting possessive of the child and the mom is wierder than on the surface... Basically he KNOWS Charlie did nothing wrong, he was just troubled and delusional, yet Locke still kept the herion and punched him out (I know, he needed a punch, but Locke did it). I am thinking Charlie's urge to 'protect the baby' is directly linked to the influence of Locke on the baby/mom in the future.
Yeah I'm not expecting to see too much of Walt anymore. He's at the age where he's going to have a growth spurt very soon, and given the passage of time on the show, he'd have to pass as 11/12 for like 8 seasons.
Joined: Sun Jan 30 2005, 03:22am
Location: looking for someones lap to curl up on
Posts: 1628
I figured out once heh Tokyo Rose was captured and beaten that Charlie had something to do with it...He didnt get enough air time so I narrowed it down to him lol I was partly right. And doesnt that one dude that talks to the fat guy look like a terrorist? I dont trust that asshole either!
Joined: Wed Mar 16 2005, 01:18am
Location: in a Finnish goat hut north of the Arctic circle
Posts: 1534
I agree Meg. Sawyer is bad as hell, heck he even pissed on Freckles haha I am sick of the Jack irritated face and the Locke all knowing face They have all needed a slap for a while I am glad Charlie got a measure of revenge on Locke Do we think the Tokyo Rose attack was part of the Sawyer/Charlie plot? I liked the notion that Officer Ana-Lucia of the Lost National Guard did it to instill some fear in the group, like she says, they aren't affraid enough.
That's what I was thinking...heh, Freckles is right to be suspicious of her, but maybe too obvious? I'd prefer it to be her, though... And I think Sawyer's planning something, it feels like he's protecting the group as well as slapping Jack and Locke in the face and just doing it in his own badass style.
wrote ... I am glad Charlie got a measure of revenge on Locke Do we think the Tokyo Rose attack was part of the Sawyer/Charlie plot? I liked the notion that Officer Ana-Lucia of the Lost National Guard did it to instill some fear in the group, like she says, they aren't affraid enough.
No, we know that it was part of the Sawyer/Charlie plot because Charlie says that San can never know what he did to her. I'm on the opposite side of how you guys feel. I don't think Sawyer did it to slap anyone in the face nor to protect anyone. I think he did it because he can't escape his past, which is to be a conman. Why else would they have constantly shown the flashbacks from his life as a conman, where he even conned the woman he loved. He is doing it for his own purposes, and Charlie was just his puppet. To attack San like that was wrong, and Locke is hardly the evil character now.
Rachel, the guy that looks like a terrorist is from Iraq or Saudi Arabia I think. He tortured prisoners. He isn't a terrorist though, I don't think. Although that is what started the first fight on the island, because someone said he probably was the reason the plane went down. Speaking of which, they never have explained why it went down have they? Maybe he was a terrorist? Who knows?
Joined: Wed Mar 16 2005, 01:18am
Location: in a Finnish goat hut north of the Arctic circle
Posts: 1534
Said was an officer in the Iraqi Republican Guard, he is not a terrorist (SAH-EED)
Brooke, I know Sawyer is all about the con, but a regime change was needed to shake up the plot!! I was wrong about Locke, but he is still Charlie's nemisis, and I do not think Charlie is a force for evil, just a force for neediness.
